# 🙋♀️💁♂️ Delegates 🤷♂️🙆♀️
**URL:** https://es.discourse.group/c/delegates/8.md
[Latest](https://es.discourse.group/latest.md) · [Categories](https://es.discourse.group/categories.md) · [Tags](https://es.discourse.group/tags.md)
---
## [About the 🙋♀️💁♂️ Delegates 🤷♂️🙆♀️ category](https://es.discourse.group/t/about-the-delegates-category/17)
**Author:** [@zkat](https://es.discourse.group/u/zkat)\
**Replies:** 0
Discussion among TC39 delegates
---
## [Multi-lingual discussion on discourse](https://es.discourse.group/t/multi-lingual-discussion-on-discourse/553)
**Author:** [@yulia](https://es.discourse.group/u/yulia)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [July 25, 2021, 3:49pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/multi-lingual-discussion-on-discourse/553 "2021-07-25T15:49:58Z")
This was raised in the website repo: https://github.com/tc39/tc39.github.io/issues/218#issuecomment-731215190 Is there a way we could make discourse a place where people can discuss JS in multiple languages? cc @aki a…
---
## [changing permissions to make private categories publicly readable](https://es.discourse.group/t/changing-permissions-to-make-private-categories-publicly-readable/226)
**Author:** [@michael](https://es.discourse.group/u/michael)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [February 19, 2020, 12:55am UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/changing-permissions-to-make-private-categories-publicly-readable/226 "2020-02-19T00:55:39Z")
At the last TC39 meeting, we agreed to make this Discourse category readable by the general public. Leaving this topic here as a reminder for one of the admins (@aki?) to do so. Feel free to delete once this is done.
---
## [reliably contacting stage 2 reviewers](https://es.discourse.group/t/reliably-contacting-stage-2-reviewers/125)
**Author:** [@michael](https://es.discourse.group/u/michael)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [December 23, 2019, 7:54pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/reliably-contacting-stage-2-reviewers/125 "2019-12-23T19:54:11Z")
At times, I've had difficulty contacting the assigned reviewers for my stage 2 proposals. Not everyone is responsive on GitHub, and I do not always have additional contact information. What can we do about this? I know t…
---
## [Update tc39-notes](https://es.discourse.group/t/update-tc39-notes/78)
**Author:** [@jridgewell](https://es.discourse.group/u/jridgewell)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [July 9, 2019, 10:25pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/update-tc39-notes/78 "2019-07-09T22:25:29Z")
Can someone who has access to tc39/tc39-notes sync it with Rick's repo? The latest meetings notes are now available.
---
## [draft spec text domain](https://es.discourse.group/t/draft-spec-text-domain/75)
**Author:** [@michael](https://es.discourse.group/u/michael)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [June 19, 2019, 11:05pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/draft-spec-text-domain/75 "2019-06-19T23:05:34Z")
Up until #1576, the draft spec text was available at https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/. At the last TC39 meeting, there was a proposal by @aki to publish it at https://tc39.es/ instead. I'd like to know why this particular…
---
## [Questions/Q&A/AMA category](https://es.discourse.group/t/questions-q-a-ama-category/44)
**Author:** [@aki](https://es.discourse.group/u/aki)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [May 3, 2019, 4:24pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/questions-q-a-ama-category/44 "2019-05-03T16:24:12Z")
How would y’all feel about having a top-level category specifically for community members to ask somewhat off-topic questions of the delegates? Sorta spitballing i guess but rules would look something like focus on pro…
---
## [Annex B category](https://es.discourse.group/t/annex-b-category/59)
**Author:** [@aki](https://es.discourse.group/u/aki)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [May 2, 2019, 7:08pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/annex-b-category/59 "2019-05-02T19:08:19Z")
Regarding Ross's reply in the categories meta discussion, any objections to creating an Annex B category? I wanted to specifically ask in the delegates-only area due to some sensitivity I've detected around annex b discu…