# 🔄 Meta

**URL:** https://es.discourse.group/c/meta/3.md

[Latest](https://es.discourse.group/latest.md) · [Categories](https://es.discourse.group/categories.md) · [Tags](https://es.discourse.group/tags.md)

---

## [Come collaborate with TC39](https://es.discourse.group/t/come-collaborate-with-tc39/7)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@system](https://es.discourse.group/u/system)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [March 7, 2019, 1:04pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/come-collaborate-with-tc39/7 "2019-03-07T13:04:33Z")

</div>

Ecma International’s TC39 is a group of JavaScript developers, implementers, academics, and more, collaborating with the community to maintain and evolve the definition of JavaScript. Join us here to get involved with th…

---

## [Chinese Translation of ECMA-262 Standard Completed](https://es.discourse.group/t/chinese-translation-of-ecma-262-standard-completed/2100)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@JinDX](https://es.discourse.group/u/JinDX)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [August 4, 2024, 11:32am UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/chinese-translation-of-ecma-262-standard-completed/2100 "2024-08-04T11:32:41Z")

</div>

Hello everyone, I am pleased to inform you that I have completed a full Chinese translation of the ECMA-262 Standard. The translation covers the entire content of the standard and is intended to make the document more a…

---

## [Are there / should there be venues for analyzing mistakes in previous specifications?](https://es.discourse.group/t/are-there-should-there-be-venues-for-analyzing-mistakes-in-previous-specifications/1852)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dWalter](https://es.discourse.group/u/dWalter)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [November 18, 2023, 5:24pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/are-there-should-there-be-venues-for-analyzing-mistakes-in-previous-specifications/1852 "2023-11-18T17:24:43Z")

</div>

Surely there are examples of specification details that "got past the goalie" so to speak. Making those mistakes known, analyzing why they got through, and adjusting processes accordingly would be a useful exercise both …

---

## [Editing posts](https://es.discourse.group/t/editing-posts/1739)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@nickmccurdy](https://es.discourse.group/u/nickmccurdy)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [June 20, 2023, 3:14am UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/editing-posts/1739 "2023-06-20T03:14:24Z")

</div>

I'd like to edit Complexity of consuming iterator helpers with symbols. to correct some misconceptions I posted, but there's no edit button, even though I'm already trust level 2. Is there a way I can edit this?

---

## [Thank You](https://es.discourse.group/t/thank-you/1409)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@beck](https://es.discourse.group/u/beck)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [July 28, 2022, 3:49pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/thank-you/1409 "2022-07-28T15:49:55Z")

</div>

After reading a thread with lots of frustration, I deeply appreciate y'all who reply with reason, perspective, and composure. Thank you for engaging with the community and having patience when some of us are difficult. …

---

## [TC39 Discord](https://es.discourse.group/t/tc39-discord/545)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@jun-sheaf](https://es.discourse.group/u/jun-sheaf)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [November 14, 2020, 10:39pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/tc39-discord/545 "2020-11-14T22:39:55Z")

</div>

IMO, a discord could rapidly increase productivity in regards to proposal discussions. Would TC39 be interested in starting one?

---

## [What should the categories be?](https://es.discourse.group/t/what-should-the-categories-be/29)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@michael](https://es.discourse.group/u/michael)\
**Replies:** 21\
**Last updated:** [March 5, 2020, 5:23pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/what-should-the-categories-be/29 "2020-03-05T17:23:10Z")

</div>

As I stated in committee today, I think the “off-topic discussion” category should be removed, as it invites noise. But what categories might we add to replace it? @zenparsing suggested an announcements category. I think…

---

## [Can we change the forum color scheme?](https://es.discourse.group/t/can-we-change-the-forum-color-scheme/177)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@trusktr](https://es.discourse.group/u/trusktr)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [January 3, 2020, 8:47pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/can-we-change-the-forum-color-scheme/177 "2020-01-03T20:47:07Z")

</div>

The theme is jarring to the eyes. The contrast is too high, it is difficult to distinguish code blocks from regular text, inline code is very hard to tell apart from regular text, and other issues. The default Discourse…

---

## [Following links should probably open new tab](https://es.discourse.group/t/following-links-should-probably-open-new-tab/51)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@OutsourcedGuru](https://es.discourse.group/u/OutsourcedGuru)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [May 23, 2019, 3:46pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/following-links-should-probably-open-new-tab/51 "2019-05-23T15:46:49Z")

</div>

The classic behavior for most forums is that any link within the text of a post needs to land on a new tab so that it doesn't take the user away from the forum. There's probably a setting somewhere for that.

---

## [Are you a delegate?](https://es.discourse.group/t/are-you-a-delegate/43)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@aki](https://es.discourse.group/u/aki)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [May 3, 2019, 3:54pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/are-you-a-delegate/43 "2019-05-03T15:54:27Z")

</div>

If you're a delegate who has just signed up for discourse, please join the delegates group by clicking "request" on the group page.

---

## [Styling and accessibility](https://es.discourse.group/t/styling-and-accessibility/53)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@bkardell](https://es.discourse.group/u/bkardell)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [May 3, 2019, 5:18am UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/styling-and-accessibility/53 "2019-05-03T05:18:06Z")

</div>

The color contrast ratio of this theme is kind of problematic for web accessibility, it would be good to improve that.

---

## [Force HTTPS usage](https://es.discourse.group/t/force-https-usage/31)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@michael](https://es.discourse.group/u/michael)\
**Replies:** 9\
**Last updated:** [April 4, 2019, 10:50pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/force-https-usage/31 "2019-04-04T22:50:23Z")

</div>

I’ve noticed that I am able to access this website over HTTP and, surprisingly, remain logged in! This means that I’ve sent my authentication token in plain text over the open internet. We should make the website unavail…

---

## [Discourse capitalises the title of my posts](https://es.discourse.group/t/discourse-capitalises-the-title-of-my-posts/34)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@michael](https://es.discourse.group/u/michael)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [April 4, 2019, 3:12am UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/discourse-capitalises-the-title-of-my-posts/34 "2019-04-04T03:12:38Z")

</div>

Changing my post from the way I wrote it and intended it to be consumed actually bothers me quite a bit. In addition to manipulating human-to-human communications, this could be problematic when talking about technical t…

---

## [About the 🔄 Meta category](https://es.discourse.group/t/about-the-meta-category/2)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@system](https://es.discourse.group/u/system)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [March 7, 2019, 1:04pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/about-the-meta-category/2 "2019-03-07T13:04:30Z")

</div>

Discussion about this site, its organization, how it works, and how we can improve it.
