# ECMAScript proposal: Hash Comments (replacement for Type Annotations)

**URL:** <https://es.discourse.group/t/ecmascript-proposal-hash-comments-replacement-for-type-annotations/2287>\
**Category:** 💡 Ideas\
**Tags:** proposal\
**Created:** [January 24, 2025, 8:40pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/ecmascript-proposal-hash-comments-replacement-for-type-annotations/2287 "2025-01-24T20:40:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rudxain](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/es.discourse.group/rudxain/32/2272_2.png) [@Rudxain](https://es.discourse.group/u/Rudxain)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2025, 10:27pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/ecmascript-proposal-hash-comments-replacement-for-type-annotations/2287/16 "2025-02-01T22:27:03Z")

</div>

I agree with your intentions, but not with the details. Take a look at [the reception that JS-Zero/JS-Sugar got](https://youtu.be/onCHSujPlfg), it's not just controversial, it seems net negative.

See also (off-topic): ["deprecate-js" proposal by Rudxain · Pull Request #9 · Rudxain/blog · GitHub](https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/pull/9)

---

_[View the full topic](https://es.discourse.group/t/ecmascript-proposal-hash-comments-replacement-for-type-annotations/2287)._