# Triple-backtick template literal with indentation support

**URL:** <https://es.discourse.group/t/triple-backtick-template-literal-with-indentation-support/337>\
**Category:** 💡 Ideas\
**Tags:** proposal\
**Created:** [May 20, 2020, 1:38pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/triple-backtick-template-literal-with-indentation-support/337 "2020-05-20T13:38:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sken130](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/es.discourse.group/sken130/32/1811_2.png) [@sken130](https://es.discourse.group/u/sken130)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2023, 6:05am UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/triple-backtick-template-literal-with-indentation-support/337/14 "2023-07-24T06:05:30Z")

</div>

Since triple backticks (```) are not backward compatible, I have updated my proposal at

> [@Raw string literals that can contain any arbitrary text without the need for special escape sequences](https://es.discourse.group/t/raw-string-literals-that-can-contain-any-arbitrary-text-without-the-need-for-special-escape-sequences/1757/3):
>
> Here is my revised proposal of raw string literal. Learn from (or combine with) the idea of C# 11's raw string literals, which solves almost all problems in one go: It solves the indentation problem in that thread Can contain any arbitrary text without escape sequences in the content Can support interpolation and defining custom interpolation delimiters so that the "normal delimiters" can be in the content without being escaped as well If we introduce new syntax, we want to put as many feature…

---

_[View the full topic](https://es.discourse.group/t/triple-backtick-template-literal-with-indentation-support/337)._