# What should the categories be?

**URL:** <https://es.discourse.group/t/what-should-the-categories-be/29>\
**Category:** 🔄 Meta\
**Created:** [March 27, 2019, 8:25pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/what-should-the-categories-be/29 "2019-03-27T20:25:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rkirsling](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/es.discourse.group/rkirsling/32/24_2.png) [@rkirsling](https://es.discourse.group/u/rkirsling)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2019, 10:53pm UTC](https://es.discourse.group/t/what-should-the-categories-be/29/11 "2019-05-01T22:53:02Z")

</div>

Various thoughts:

Seems like `Intl` deserves a category.

For proposals, I think we already tend to view them as implicitly grouped so it's probably a matter of making those groupings explicit. `OOP` (or `Classes`) and `RegExp` seem like good, clear ones. `Built-ins` might be a bit too coarse-grained, but then I'm also not certain how granular we want to get.

I was going to say `Annex B` too but I'm not sure whether this is the place we expect to have such conversations.

I think a category for assistance with spec-reading might be cool? Not sure what we'd call it; `How Do I` isn't quite right and `Does This Mean What I Think It Means` is too long. 😂

---

_[View the full topic](https://es.discourse.group/t/what-should-the-categories-be/29)._