In ECMA I would use (variable === val1 || variable === val2 ...)
to attempt to compare a variable to multiple values. I think it would be a lot more elegant to run
variable === | val1, val 2 |
and have it automatically expand.
In ECMA I would use (variable === val1 || variable === val2 ...)
to attempt to compare a variable to multiple values. I think it would be a lot more elegant to run
variable === | val1, val 2 |
and have it automatically expand.
I think this can be used as:
[val1, val2, ...].includes(variable)
Still wouldn’t be able to do operations like <, >, etc. with include.
I think
[val1, val2, ... ].some(v => v > variable)
is a good alternative.
The proposed | val1, val2 |
semantics implicitly relies on the context of | |
. For example, how should they be evaluated?
f(| a, b |, c);
g(| a, b |, | c, d |);
It is also unclear whether | a, b |
can be nested
val > | a, | b, c | |
or whether it can be the RHS of an assignment
var x = | 1, 2 |;